Legislation Details

File #: RES.52-2026    Version: 2
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 2/27/2026 In control: City Council of Yonkers Stated Meeting
On agenda: 3/10/2026 Final action: 3/10/2026
Title: A RESOLUTION REQUESTING NEW YORK STATE PASS LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE RECURRING AID TO MUNICIPALITIES TO OFFSET COSTS OF THE NEW YORK STATE HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM (NYSHIP)
RESOLUTION

BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT COLLINS-BELLAMY, MAJORITY LEADER RUBBO, MAJORITY WHIP NORMAN, MINORITY LEADER BREEN, COUNCILMEMBERS PINEDA-ISAAC, DIAZ, AND HODGES:

title
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING NEW YORK STATE PASS LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE RECURRING AID TO MUNICIPALITIES TO OFFSET COSTS OF THE NEW YORK STATE HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM (NYSHIP)
body

WHEREAS, the New York State Health Insurance Program (NYSHIP) provides health insurance coverage to municipal employees and retirees across New York State; and

WHEREAS, healthcare costs under NYSHIP are increasing at a rate significantly exceeding inflation, while municipalities have no authority to control, plan, or design, premium setting, or cost-containment measures; and

WHEREAS, the 2026 NYSHIP family plan premium increased by 8.79 percent to approximately $44,000 annually, and if such growth trends continue, the cost of a family plan is projected to exceed $100,000 by 2036; and

WHEREAS, efforts to mitigate these costs through increased employee or union contributions cannot fully offset the magnitude of projected increases; and

WHEREAS, the City of Yonkers currently faces gross annual NYSHIP premiums totaling approximately $240 million, which are projected to exceed $550 million within ten (10) years - an average annual increase of $31.8 million; and

WHEREAS, the City’s current property tax levy totals approximately $452 million, and under the New York State property tax cap, annual levy increases are limited to approximately two percent (2%), generating only $9.9 million in additional revenue per year which results in a projected annual shortfall of approximately $21.9 million solely attributable to health insurance cost growth, even before accounting for other mandatory spending increases including pensions, contractual salary obligations, and other non-discretionary expenses; and

WHEREAS, even freezing all other municipal spending would not be sufficient to close the projected gap created by escalating ...

Click here for full text